Does Anyone Still Question 9/11 Was An Inside Job?

Our old buddy Albert Einstein said


CONDEMNATION WITHOUT INVESTIGATION IS THE HIGHEST FORM OF IGNORANCE.


So let's investigate shall we?

Too many people people gobble up the government's story, don't research anything about it and are quick to attack someone who challenges it with an arsenal of information.

I know I'll get a lot of backlash for this, but there seems to be way too much ignorance still about 9/11 and you know I have to speak on it. I typed this up in 10 minutes, real quick like and it's jam packed with, a lot of questions I think everyone has and a few you probably haven't even thought of yet, as well as substantiated evidence backed by numerous sources, to give credence to my point. I don't claim to know everything about what happened, not by any means. I've always thought the whole thing was bogus.

I've been curious about the details since it happened and I've read enough to know we've been lied to, big time!

I'm not trying to start a new conspiracy theory. I'm rejecting the official conspiracy theory given to us by the government.

Let me start with this

If you believe the official fable the government handed out, according to these polls you are part of the minority.



In a 2004 CNN poll on Anderson Cooper, 89% of the people believe there was a government cover up.
http://edition.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/14340.exclude.html

In an MSNBC poll, 67% of the people believe the government was involved
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14727720

In a New York Times and CBS poll, only 16% of the people believe Bush was telling the truth. 84% reject the official story!
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/13469

In a 2004 Zogby poll, half of New Yorkers believe US leaders had forehand knowledge
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.cfm?ID=855

Radio Poll: 85% Of Canadians Believe 9/11 Inside Job
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/September2006/120906_b_Poll.htm

The senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission - John Farmer - says that the government agreed to lie. HE'S ADMITTING THEY LIED!
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/89754

He's writing a book on it now where he's going to expose the whole shebang.
http://www.amazon.ca/Ground-Truth-Behind-Americas-Defense/dp/0151013764

The majority of 9/11 Commission members have now came out and said that it's a fraud
http://www.infowars.com/911-commission-members-doubt-official-story/
http://www.911summary.com/

Bill Doyle - Representative Of Largest 9/11 Families Group Says Government Complicit In Attack

"The continuing cover-up is beyond belief," Doyle told GCN radio host Alex Jones.

"It looks like there was a conspiracy behind 9/11 if you really look at all the facts - a lot of families now feel the same way."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2006/080706governmentcomplicit.htm

More and more people question every day.

200+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

800+ Engineers and Architects
http://patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html

200+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals
http://patriotsquestion911.com/pilots.html

400+ Professors Question 9/11
http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html

230+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members
http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html

200+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals
http://patriotsquestion911.com/media.html

Firefighers for 911 Truth
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/


Too many people simply do not know what happened because they just haven't been exposed to the information. Too many people also think they already know everything and have a set belief system, that when challenged they have a tendency to say things like "Ohhh that can't be, our government would never do that!", "That only happens in third world countries!", "That's impossible, I would of heard it by now!" Bla blabiddy bla bla. The biggest personal disservice one can do is not keeping an open mind. I know for some it's difficult to imagine our government played a hand in this, but false flag operations and government sponsored terror are not new concepts and have been done in the past. False flag operations have been used to get us into every major war since our country's inception. This is no different! For those of you who do not know what a false flag operation is...

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.

Some examples

The planned, but never executed, 1962 Operation Northwoods plot by the U.S. Department of Defense for a war with Cuba involved scenarios such as hijacking a passenger plane, sinking a U.S. ship, burning crops and blaming such actions on Cuba. It was authored by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, nixed by John F. Kennedy, came to light through the Freedom of Information Act and was publicized by James Bamford.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag#Examples_of_false_flag_attacks_as_pretexts_for_war
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1

This document, titled "Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba" was provided by the JCS to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962, as the key component of Northwoods. Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba. These proposals - part of a secret anti-Castro program known as Operation Mongoose - included staging the assassinations of Cubans living in the United States, developing a fake "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington," including "sink[ing] a boatload of Cuban refugees (real or simulated)," faking a Cuban airforce attack on a civilian jetliner, and concocting a "Remember the Maine" incident by blowing up a U.S. ship in Cuban waters and then blaming the incident on Cuban sabotage.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/ http://911review.com/precedent/century/northwoods.html





WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A DECLASSIFIED FALSE FLAG OPERATION OF A GOVERNMENT APPROVED PLAN TO MURDER ITS OWN CITIZENS, TO JUSTIFY THE INVASION OF ANOTHER COUNTRY!

This can't be any clearer. If our government was going to go through with this, why is it so damn hard for people to imagine that 9/11 is any different?

More excellent examples:

Hitler and the Nazi's were involved in burning down the German parliament, The Reichstag. Hitler in turn immediately blamed the Communists while The Reichstag was still burning. Shortly thereafter he went to war. We blamed Osama and Al Qaeda, shortly thereafter we went to war. A decree entitled, "For the Protection of the People and the State." Justified as a "defensive measure against Communist acts of violence endangering the state," the decree suspended the constitutional guarantees pertaining to civil liberties in Germany and enabled the government to spy on its people and take away their rights. It stated:

"Restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press; on the rights of assembly and association; and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications and warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed." Looks kinda like the Patriot Act, huh?

Two weeks after the Reichstag fire, Hitler requested the Reichstag to temporarily delegate its powers to him so that he could adequately deal with the crisis. Then "Enabling Act" made Hitler dictator of Germany, freed of all legislative and constitutional constraints.

The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, signed on May 9, 2007 declares that in the event of a "catastrophic event", George Bush (now Obama) can become what is best described as "a dictator": "The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government." This directive, completely unnoticed by the media, and given no scrutiny by Congress, literally gives the White House unprecedented dictatorial power over the government and the country, bypassing the US Congress and obliterating the separation of powers. The directive also placed the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic "security".

Why would Hitler and his associates turn a blind eye to an impending terrorist attack on their national congressional building or actually assist with such a horrific deed? Because they knew what government officials have known throughout history - that during extreme national emergencies, people are most scared and thus much more willing to surrender their liberties in return for "security." The government and special interests then have a green light to carry out their agendas. And that's exactly what happened during the Reichstag terrorist crisis and our terrorist crisis 9/11. Consider the similarities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2007/03/the-reichstag-fire-and-the-enabling-act/
http://www.oilempire.us/reichstag-fire.html

Have we forgotten about the Gulf of Tonkin incident?

The NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports to make it look like we got attacked, so we could start the war in Vietnam. This is now declassified and it is a known fact.

http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/gulf_of_tonkin/index.shtml








What about WWII?

Well we all know by now that Pearl Harbor was provoked and known well in advance. Roosevelt's policy toward Japan was one of systematic pressure to force the Japanese imperialists to commit the overt act which would touch off a war explosion. Roosevelt was obliged to pursue this strategy in order to be able to brand Japan as the aggressor and stampede the people of the United States into a war to which a majority of the nation had been steadfastly opposed. The peace-loving President had assured the American people that their sons would not be sent to fight in foreign wars. This made it necessary that the United States should be attacked so that the drive of American imperialism for mastery of the Pacific could be presented in the guise of a war of national defense and survival.

Admiral Robert Theobald, the Commander of all destroyers at Pearl Harbor, wrote a book entitled 'The Final Secret of Pearl Harbor', in which he detailed his conclusions about the "surprise attack." He wrote:
1.President Roosevelt forced Japan to war and enticed them to initiate hostilities by holding the
Pacific fleet in Hawaiian waters as an invitation to that attack;
2.The plans to use Pearl Harbor as the bait started in June, 1940;
3.War with Japan meant war with Germany; and
4.Roosevelt, Marshall and Stark knew about Pearl Harbor 21 hours before the attack.

http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/fdr_provoked_the_japanese_attack.htm
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/20/001.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Harbor_advance-knowledge_debate





What about WWI?

International bankers wanted in on WWI for profit and the Lucitainia was deliberately sent into German waters. Robert Lansing, the Assistant Secretary of State, is on record as stating:
"We must educate the public gradually - draw it along to the point where it will be willing to go into the war."

Even though Wilson proclaimed America's neutrality in the European War, in accordance with the prior admonitions of George Washington, his government was secretly plotting to involve the American people by having the Lusitania sunk. This was made public in the book 'The Intimate Papers of Colonel House', written by a supporter of the Colonel, who recorded a conversation between Colonel House and Sir Edward Grey of England, the Foreign Secretary of England:

Grey: What will America do if the Germans sink an ocean liner with American passengers on board?

House: I believe that a flame of indignation would sweep the United States and that by itself would be sufficient to carry us into the war.

Colonel House convinced President Wilson that the United States should enter World War I.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_M._House
http://books.google.com/books?id=-3EShjGGNpUC&dq=The+Intimate+Papers+of+Colonel+House,&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=g3knM-8p4g&sig=qIH0o1gogwuHlw2zgYcWq4z4_ac&hl=en&ei=ENdKSpvEFIrZlAeM0-DfDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4





Now comes the fun part

FACT: NEVER BEFORE IN HISTORY HAS A STEEL REINFORCED BUILDING FALLEN DUE TO FIRE!

ON SEPTEMER 11TH 3 BUILDINGS FELL DUE TO FIRE IN A MATTER OF HOURS

What are the odds of that happening?

Here are some examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe than those in the WTC buildings. In these precedents, the fires consumed multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in the WTC towers did none of these things.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html

"THE BUILDINGS COULD SUSTAIN MULTIPLE IMPACTS OF JETLINERS"

Manager of WTC Construction & Project Management, Frank DeMartini





WHAT ABOUT BUILDING 7?



It didn't get hit with any planes at and it is not even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.
Larry Silverstein (then owner) admitted having the building "pulled" or demolished.





John Kerry confirmed that





The thing is he said they did it because it posed a danger. It takes weeks to wire a building like that...hmmm.....here's the light bulb moment!





Why did Larry Silverstein take out a lease for 99 years in July of 2001 on the WTC, two months before the attack? Larry upped the insurance at that time to $3.5 billion and (presciently) to cover potential hits by airliners flown by "terrorist hijackers"

HE INCLUDED TERRORIST HIJACKERS FLYING A PLANE INTO THE BUILDING AS A POSSIBLE PERIL TO BE COVERED!

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/04/374254.shtml http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein.html

That is highly unusual. I've worked for over 20 insurance companies and I've never seen a policy with specific coverage for this.

WHY DID BBC REPORT BUILDING 7 COLLAPSED 20 MINUTES BEFORE IT DID?

The transmission conveniently gets cut moments before the building does "collapse". This video demonstrates that there were people in the know about the controlled demolition that was to take place and the story was leaked early.








The question whether explosives were used or not has already been answered. We now know that planes did not bring down the towers. It's not a question anymore. Nano-thermite explosives were discovered in the dust. 8 scientists from premier universities around the world wrote a paper on it, here:

http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/openaccess2.htm
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/thermite.htm










YOU WANT SOME MORE SCIENCE?

How about over 700 architects and structural engineers giving you the latest evidence of controlled demolition with the use of explosives? No conspiracy theories here, just pure physics for all you scientists out there.


YOU WANT SOME MORE SCIENCE?

How about over 700 architects and structural engineers giving you the latest evidence of controlled demolition with the use of explosives? No conspiracy theories here, just pure physics for all you scientists out there.









http://www.ae911truth.org/

So now we now explosives were used and we were lied to by our government. What's the next step? Logically, we need to find out who planted them. I doubt crazy terrorists with long beards, wearing robes and turbines, just waltzed in there and dropped them off. That kind of logic would suite some people, but not me. Even if they were undercover, they would have had to enter the building and plant the explosives strategically many times, over and over again throughout the building, to demolish it. It takes weeks maybe months, as commercial architect Richard Gage founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth) said in his documentary.
The people who planted them had to have access to every area of the building that is required for controlled demolition. If they needed access, they needed to get by security. Who was in charge of security?

MARVIN BUSH!

Well wooptie-do, what a coinkidink!

Bush served on the board of Securacom (since renamed Stratesec). The chairman of the board of Stratesec is Wirt D. Walker III, a cousin of Marvin and George W. Bush. Securacom had contracts to provide security for Dulles International Airport (the airport from which American Airlines Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon, originated) and the World Trade Center in New York. Securacom's backers include a number of Kuwaitis through a company called KuwAm Corp (Kuwaiti-American Corp.). Stratesec also has Saudi investors.

http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/10-16-03/discussion.cgi.16.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securacom http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0204-06.htm

POWER WAS DOWN ON THE WEEKEND PRIOR TO 9/11

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/11/interview-with-scott-forbes.html



"Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower."

SURVEILLANCE TAPES AND MAINTENANCE LOGS ARE AMONG THE MISSING EVIDENCE!

http://cms.firehouse.com/web/online/News/WTC-Surveillance-Tapes-Feared-Missing-/46$1561
Isn't that convenient?

WHY WAS ALL EVIDENCE CONTAINING DEBRIS AND WRECKAGE SHIPPED TO CHINA IMMEDIATELY?

Instead of being taken to the FBI-controlled dump on Staten Island where all the material is being stored and sifted, it was driven directly to the independently-owned scrapyards and then sold and shipped to China.

http://www.china.org.cn/english/2002/Jan/25776.htm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1357981/250-tons-of-scrap-stolen-from-ruins.html



WHY WERE THERE ABNORMALLY HIGH AMOUNTS OF PUT OPTIONS (BETS THAT A STOCK WILL FALL) PLACED ON UNITED AIRLINES, BOEING, AND AMERICAN AIRLINES WEEKS BEFORE THE ATTACK?

On the Chicago Board Options Exchange during the week before September 11th, put options were purchased on American and United Airlines, the two airlines involved in the attacks. The investors who placed these orders were gambling that in the short term the stock prices of both Airlines would plummet. Never before on the Chicago Exchange were such large amounts of United and American Airlines options traded. These investors netted a profit of at least $5 million after the September 11th attacks.
Interestingly, the names of the investors remain undisclosed and the $5 million remains unclaimed in the Chicago Exchange account.

Tthe Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options? Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these "insiders" would have profited by almost $5 million. On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;? Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent "insiders," they would represent a gain of about $4 million.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115292514221107632.html

WHY WAS DICK CHENEY IN CHARGE OF NORTH AMERICAN AEROSPACE DEFENSE COMMAND (NORAD) ON THE MORNING OF SEPTEMBER 11TH?

For the first time in US history a President or Vice President took charge of this military agency. Generals were always in charge and had the authority to shoot down hijacked aircraft. They were able to police the skies, like the police does our streets.

NORAD Stand down order

http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/norad/docs/intercept_proc.pdf

WHY DID NORAD CONDUCT DRILLS AND EXERCISES 2 YEARS BEFORE THE ATTACK AND ON THE MORNING OF SEPTEMBER 11TH , OF HIJACKED PLANES BEING USED AS WEAPONS? SPECIFICALLY BEING FLOWN INTO THE WORLD TRADE TOWERS AND THE PENTAGON?

WHY DID OUR TRILLION DOLLAR DEFENSE SYSTEM FAIL MISERABLY?

We have the most advanced radar and defense system known to man?

WHERE WAS THE $130 BILLION DOLLAR PENTAGON STAR WARS MISSILE DEFENSE?

These sophisticated military systems were designed to detect missiles fired from unknown locations at over 13,000 mph and shoot them down in mere minutes, why on 9/11 could they not detect any one of the four large airliners traveling at a mere 600 mph, especially when two of them were known to be lost for over 40 minutes before they crashed?

http://articles.latimes.com/2004/dec/20/opinion/ed-missiles20

WHY DID FLIGHT 77 FLY TOWARD THE PENTAGON UNDETECTED FOR 40 MINUTES? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? THAT IS ABSURD!

Any plane flying toward the Pentagon would have been detected and intercepted long before it got close.

By the way
The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program, Dr. Robert M. Bowman, says that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney. He said that at the bare minimum if Osama bin Laden and

Al-Qaeda were involved in 9/11 then the government stood down and allowed the attacks to happen. Bowman outlined how the drills on the morning of 9/11.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2004/080904wargamescover.htm

Simulated planes crashing into buildings on the east coast were used as a cover to dupe unwitting air defense personnel into not responding quickly enough to stop the attack.

"The exercises that went on that morning simulating the exact kind of thing that was happening so confused the people in the FAA and NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was real and what was part of the exercise," said Bowman

"I think the people who planned and carried out those exercises, they're the ones that should be the object of investigation."

Asked if he could name a prime suspect who was the likely architect behind the attacks,
Bowman stated, "If I had to narrow it down to one person....I think my prime suspect would be Dick Cheney."

Bowman said that privately his military fighter pilot peers and colleagues did not disagree with his sentiments about the real story behind 9/11. He agreed that the US was in danger of slipping into a dictatorship and stated, "I think there's been nothing closer to fascism than what we've seen lately from this government."

Bowman slammed the Patriot Act as having, "Done more to destroy the rights of Americans than all of our enemies combined."

He trashed the 9/11 Commission as a politically motivated cover-up with abounding conflicts of interest, charging, "The 9/11 Commission omitted anything that might be the least bit suspicious or embarrassing or in any way detract from the official conspiracy so it was a total whitewash."

"There needs to be a true investigation, not the kind of sham investigations we have had with the 9/11 omission and all the rest of that junk," said Bowman.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Bowman

WHY DID CHENEY TELL NORAD TOLD TO STAND DOWN ON THE MORNING OF SEPTEMBER 11TH?





Americas Air Force can scramble jets to intercept anything unusual within about 10 minutes. It took over a half an hour to scramble jets from the FURTHEST airports! 4 commercial jets were supposedly hijacked and cruising all over the map for over 1 1/2 hours, and we're supposed to believe they couldn't get even one jet out??

Why is Osama Bin Laden not officially charged for 9/11? He's not even wanted on the FBI list for 9/11. He's wanted for an embassy bombing, but not 9/11. The FBI's response to that was, "We could find enough evidence to convict him." AND WE WENT TO WAR?

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm

Here's what Jesse Ventura, former Navy Seal, Mayor and Governor says about it, as he speaks at a Ron Paul Rally (9/2/08)





Why did the Bush administrations neo-con think-tank, Project for a New American Century's (PNAC) 2000 document, "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century", call for a New Pearl Harbor.

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event-like a new Pearl Harbor."

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#.22New_Pearl_Harbor.22

It reads in their Statement of Principles
1) Increase an already enormous military budget at the expense of domestic social programs
2) Toppling of regimes resistant to our corporate interests
3) Forcing democracy at the barrel of a gun in regions that have no history of the democratic process
4) Replacing the UN's role of preserving and extending international order

http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm

There is now evidence that what the world is witnessing is a cold and calculated war plan - at least four years in the making - and that, from reading Zbigniew Brzezinski's own words about Pearl Harbor, the World Trade Center attacks were just the trigger needed to set the final conquest in motion.

"The attitude of the American public toward the external projection of American power has been much more ambivalent. The public supported America's engagement in World War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor."

http://www.wanttoknow.info/brzezinskigrandchessboard

On September 10th, President George W. Bush recorded in his diary that

"the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today".

http://www.wmin.ac.uk/sshl/page-2485



WHY DID BUSH AND CHENEY INSIST ON MEETING BEHIND CLOSED DOORS AND NOT TESTIFY UNDER OATH IN FRONT OF THE 9/11 COMMISSION?














One final question

IF ALL OUR MAJOR WARS WERE CATEGORICALLY PROVEN TO BE FALSE FLAG TYPE INCIDENTS, THEN HOW IS 9/11 ANY DIFFERENT?


Here's your light bulb moment!



For more info

Loose Change Final Cut is the definitive 9/11 documentary
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3719259008768610598

9/11 Martial Law: Rise Of The Police State is probably the most effective 9/11 doc
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4382151310886411718&ei=43fPSt-JDIeu2wLCrPGsCQ&q=9+11+martial+law+rise+of+the+police+state&hl=en&client=firefox-a#

Fabled Enemies is another great 9/11 movie with a different edge
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2144933190875239407&ei=czczScLfCoSKqQOA5a3nDQ&q=fabled+enemies&hl=en

Terrorstorm is full of documented facts about government sponsored terrorism
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8136133221213939183&ei=fCwzScrBM4b-qAPck4niDQ&q=terrorstorm+final+cut

Zeitgeist will put everything into perspective
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-594683847743189197&ei=oLpNSu-lKIb2rQOxzLTDBg&q=zeitgeist&emb=1

War Made Easy is another documentary on wars and private interests
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8383084962209910782&ei=qDYzSf-NH5nWqAPYv5XzDQ&q=war+made+easy&hl=en

Endgame is a great documentary on who's really in charge of your global enslavement
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261&ei=Yj8zSb3ZAoTyqAPtivD2BQ&q=endgame&hl=en

Zeitgeist Addendum gives a solution
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912&ei=oLpNSu-lKIb2rQOxzLTDBg&q=zeitgeist&emb=1

And there's so much more...just research damn it wake the hell up!

What's gonna happen next?

Jon Stewart Blasts Glenn Beck & Michael Scheuer For Promoting Slaughter Of Americans

Michael Scheuer, former CIA Counterterorism Analyst:

"The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States."

"Only Osama can execute an attack which will force Americans to demand that their government protect them effectively, consistently, and with as much violence as necessary."


So let me get this straight....another 9/11 is needed, more Americans have to die and more of our rights have to be taken away in order for us to be saved. BULLSHIT!

And how could Glen Beck just sit back and agree with him?? I think I've lost all respect for him.
Speaking about rights, Scheuer confirms that the government wants to move against the 2nd Ammendement and take our guns away.





John Stewart Blasts Scheuer And Beck For Promoting The Slaughter Of Americans

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart	Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Osama bin Laden Needs to Attack America
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Jason Jones in Iran

Major General Albert Stubblebine: Towers Fell Down Because of Explosives

I love this! The former Commanding General of the United States Army is coming out and saying explosives brought down the towers, a plane did not hit the pentagon and THE PRESS IS NOT FREE BECAUSE THEY ARE TOLD WHAT TO SAY.

SUCK ON THAT NAYSAYERS!

This is just another example of a prominent figure who is speaking the truth and making your petty, irrational arguments and lousy debuning look even more pathetic.



Major General Albert N. Stubblebine is a graduate of the U.S. Military Academy (West Point, class of 52) who enjoyed a distinguished 32 year career in the U.S. Army.

He retired as the Commanding General of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM).

In is last assignment, retired Major General Albert N. Stubblebine was responsible of all of the army’s strategic intelligence forces around the world. He had responsibilities for the signals intelligence, photo intelligence, counter-intelligence and human intelligence.

“I do not believe the free press is free anymore [...] The press is saying what they have been told to say about this. Now do I have proof about this? No. But I believe that all the stories that were told about 9/11 were false.”
— Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III

Prior to this assignment he commanded the US Army Electronics Research and Development Command (ERADCOM). During his active duty career he commanded soldiers at every level. One of his experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s imagery interpretation for scientific and technical intelligence during the Cold War. Among his other accomplishments, he participated in a special task force which defined the requirements of the U.S. Army for future conflict.

He is a long-term out-of-the-box thinker who redesigned the U.S. Army’s Intelligence Architecture while serving as the Commanding General of the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. This intelligence restructuring earned him his place in the Intelligence Hall of Fame.

Major General Albert N. Stubblebine doesn’t believe in the official conspiracy theory put forward by the Bush administration and has been a 9/11 Truth defender for many years. In a recent interview, he mentions “you look at the buildings falling, they didn’t fall down because of an airplane hit them, they fell down because explosives went off inside. Demolition. Look at Building 7 for God sakes.”

“What is it they do not want the public to know?”






After his retirement, Major General Stubblebine served as the VP for Intelligence Systems with BDM, a major defense contractor. He has brought these experiences to leading-edge medical research and development in collaboration with his wife Rima E. Laibow, M.D.

http://world911truth.org/major-general-albert-stubblebine-towers-fell-down-because-of-explosives/

YES, THEY WALK AMONG US, ARE IN POLITICS, AND THEY CONTINUE TO BREED

WAKE UP AMERICA!

If you think a travel agent's job is boring, just look at these examples:

A DC airport ticket agent offers some examples of 'why' our country is
in trouble!

1. I had a New Hampshire Congresswoman ask for an aisle seat so that her
hair wouldn't get messed up by being near the window..

2.. I got a call from a candidate's staffer, who wanted to go to Capetown I started to explain
the length of the flight and the passport information, and then she interrupted me with,
''I'm not trying to make you look stupid, but Capetown is in Massachusetts .''

Without trying to make her look stupid, I calmly explained, ''Cape Cod is in
Massachusetts , Capetown is in Africa ''

Her response - click.

3. A senior Vermont Congressman called, furious about a Florida package we did. I asked
what was wrong with the vacation in Orlando. He said he was expecting an ocean-view
room. I tried to explain that's not possible, since Orlando is in the middle of the state.

He replied, 'don't lie to me, I looked on the map and Florida is a very thin state!'' (OMG)

4. I got a call from a lawmaker's wife who asked, ''Is it possible to see England from
Canada ?''

I said, ''No.''

She said, ''But they look so close on the map.'' (OMG, again!)

5. An aide for a cabinet member once called and asked if he could rent a car in Dallas.
When I pulled up the reservation, I noticed he had only a 1-hour layover in Dallas.
When I asked him why he wanted to rent a car, he said, ''I heard Dallas was a big
airport, and we will need a car to drive between gates to save time.''

6. An Illinois Congresswoman called last week. She needed to know how it was possible
that her flight from Detroit left at 8:30 a.m., and got to Chicago at 8:33 a.m. I explained
that Michigan was an hour ahead of Illinois , but she couldn't understand the concept of
time zones. Finally, I told her the plane went fast, and she bought that.

7. A New York lawmaker called and asked, ''Do airlines put your physical description on
your bag so they know whose luggage belongs to whom?''
I said, 'No, why do you ask?'

She replied, ''Well, when I checked in with the airline, they put a tag on my luggage
that said (FAT), and I'm overweight. I think that's very rude!''

After putting her on hold for a minute, while I looked into it. (I was dying laughing). I
came back and explained the city code for Fresno , CA is (FAT - Fresno Air Terminal),
and the airline was just putting a destination tag on her luggage..

8. A Senator's aide called to inquire about a trip package to Hawaii. After going over all
the cost info, she asked, ''Would it be cheaper to fly to California , and then take the
train to Hawaii ?''

9. I just got off the phone with a freshman Congressman who asked, ''How do I know
which plane to get on?''

I asked him what exactly he meant, to which he replied, ''I was told my flight number is
823, but none of these planes have numbers on them.''

10. A lady Senator called and said, ''I need to fly to Pepsi-Cola, Florida .. Do I have to get
on one of those little computer planes?''

I asked if she meant fly to Pensacola , FL on a commuter plane.

She said, ''Yeah, whatever, smarty!''

11. A senior Senator called and had a question about the documents he needed in order to
fly to China . After a lengthy discussion about passports, I reminded him that he
needed a visa. 'Oh, no I don't. I've been to China many times and never had to have one
of those.''

I double checked and sure enough, his stay required a visa. When I told him this he
said, ''Look, I've been to China four times and every time they have accepted my
American Express!''

12 A New Mexico Congress woman called to make reservations, ''I want to go from
Chicago to Rhino, New York. '' I was at a loss for words. Finally, I said, ''Are you sure
that's the name of the town?'' '
'Yes, what flights do you have?'' replied the lady. After some searching, I came back
with, ''I'm sorry, ma'am, I've looked up every airport code in the country and can't find a
rhino anywhere.'

''The lady retorted, ''Oh, don't be silly! Everyone knows where it is. Check your map!''

So I scoured a map of the state of New York and finally offered, ''You don't mean
Buffalo, do you?''

The reply? ''Whatever! I knew it was a big animal.''
Now you know why the Government is in the shape that it's in!

Could anyone be this DUMB?

YES, THEY WALK AMONG US, ARE IN POLITICS, AND THEY CONTINUE TO BREED

You start off each day with reading this then you have no reason to ask the Question: What are they thinking in DC.

Jam of the year

¡VIVA LA REVOLUCION!

Let's go California, where you at??

Our government is becoming increasingly tyranical, fascist, dictatorial, oppressive and draconian every day. We need every state to introduce bills like this to protect the people. The Federal Government has been violating our constitutional rights for too long and we need our state representatives to get out of bed with the special interest groups and start representing the people again. START REPRESENTING THE PEOPLE AGAIN! That would be in a perfect world however, where money does not corrupt our politicians to shit all over the constitution.



REFERENCE TITLE: sovereignty; tenth amendment.

State of Arizona

House of Representatives

Forty-ninth Legislature

First Regular Session

2009



HCR 2024



Introduced by

Representatives Burges, Ash, Biggs, Boone, Gowan, Mason, Montenegro, Pancrazi, Seel, Williams: Barto, Campbell CL, Court, Crandall, Crump, Driggs, Fleming, Goodale, Hendrix, Kavanagh, Lesko, McComish, McGuire, Miranda B, Murphy, Nichols, Pratt, Quelland, Stevens, Tobin, Weiers JP, Senator Harper



A concurrent RESOLUTION


Claiming sovereignty under the tenth amendment to the constitution of the united states over certain powers, serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates and providing that certain federal legislation be prohibited or repealed.


Whereas, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"; and

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and

Whereas, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

Whereas, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and

Whereas, many federal laws are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp; and

Whereas, Article IV, section 4, United States Constitution, says in part, "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government", and the Ninth Amendment states that "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"; and

Whereas, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

Whereas, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States.



Therefore

Be it resolved by the House of Representatives of the State of Arizona, the Senate concurring, that:

1. That the State of Arizona hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.

2. That this Resolution serves as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.

3. That all compulsory federal legislation that directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed.

4. That the Secretary of State of the State of Arizona transmit copies of this resolution to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate of each state's legislature and each Member of Congress from the State of Arizona.

http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/1r/bills/hcr2024p.htm



The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
-- U.S. Constitution, Tenth Amendment

Fed up with Washington's involvement in everything from land use to gun control to education spending, states across the country are fighting back against what they say is the federal government's growing intrusion on their rights.

At least 35 states have introduced legislation this year asserting their power under the Tenth Amendment to regulate all matters not specifically delegated to the federal government by the Constitution.

"This has been boiling for years, and it's finally come to a head," said Utah State Rep. Carl Wimmer. "With TARP and No Child Left Behind, these things that continue to give the federal government more authority, our rights as states and individuals are being turned on their head."

The power struggle between the states and Washington has cropped up periodically ever since the country was founded. But now some states are sending a simple, forceful message:

The government has gone too far. Enough is enough.

Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer recently signed into law a bill authorizing the state's gun manufacturers to produce "Made in Montana" firearms, without seeking licensing from the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Similar laws are being considered in Utah, Alaska, Texas and Tennessee.

The Montana law is expected to end up in the courts, where states' rights activists hope judges will uphold their constitutional right to regulate firearms.

That would reverse a longstanding trend, said Martin Flaherty, a professor of constitutional law at Fordham Law School.

"From 1937 to 1995 there is not one instance of the Supreme Court knocking back Congress," he said. "In the Constitution the interstate commerce clause gives Congress the right to regulate commerce between the states. That gives them a lot of power. There were questions of how far they can reach, but then comes the New Deal, and Roosevelt gets all these picks on the [Supreme] Court, and they come upon a theory whereupon congressional power is almost infinite."



That 1930s understanding of the Constitution is now the norm, with advocates for the federal government arguing that issues of a certain size and scope can be addressed only by an institution with the resources of the federal government.

As an example, federal authority is necessary in the economic crisis, said U.S. Rep. Dan Boren, whose home state of Oklahoma recently passed a sovereignty resolution.

"The economic situation in our nation over the past year has not been contained in any one community or state. The industries and institutions affected by the recent economic crisis touch multiple layers of our economy and are not confined to any one state or region," he said in a statement. "I feel there was Constitutional justification for Congress's recent efforts to stabilize our economy."

But for many state leaders, the degree to which Congress regulates issues within their boundaries, using the interstate commerce clause to regulate just about everything and anything, has become untenable.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry made headlines recently when he made a passing reference to the possibility of the Lone Star State seceding from the U.S., saying, "if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, you know, who knows what might come out of that?"

States rights advocates offer countless examples of what they believe is Washington's overreach.

In Utah, 67 percent of the state's land is controlled by the federal government through wilderness preserves, limiting state leaders in their bid to fill government coffers through oil and natural gas drilling after Interior Secretary Ken Salazar cancelled 103,000 acres of leases this year.

In Idaho, ranchers are furious that federal endangered species law prevents them from shooting the wolves that prey on their cattle.

"The balance of power between the states and the federal government is way out of whack," said Georgia state Senator Chip Pearson." The effect here is incalculable. Everything you do from the moment you wake up until you get to bed, there is some federal law or restriction."

Up until recently, the state sovereignty movement has remained almost entirely Republican, drawing supporters from the ranks that voted against President Obama and attended tea parties last month to protest federal tax hikes.

But the movement's rank and file are just as likely now to criticize Obama's predecessor, George W. Bush, as they are the new president, pointing to what they believe were Bush's overreaching policies on education and homeland security.

Many are becoming frequent visitors to a Web site, TenthAmendmentCenter.com, which was founded in early 2007 and has become a community bulletin board for states rights activists and politicians. Up to 20,000 viewers log on to the site every day.

The site's founder, Michael Boldin, a 36-year-old Web marketer in Los Angeles who says he has no political affiliation, says he decided to launch the site after watching the Maine State Legislature fight the Department of Homeland Security on the Real ID act, a controversial Bush-era law that will require states to issue federally regulated identification cards, complete with biometric data and stringent address checks.

"Maine resisted, and the government backed off, and soon all these other states were doing the same thing," Boldin said. "The bottom line is, if there's widespread support, people can resist the federal government at the state level."

The deadline for states to comply with Real ID has now been pushed back until 2011.

The Tenth Amendment movement is not without controversy. In Georgia, a columnist for The Atlanta Journal Constitution called a sovereignty resolution in the state Senate a threat "to secede from and even disband the United States."

The resolution, which was passed as part of a group of bills that were banded together, affirmed the state's powers under the Tenth Amendment, taking its inspiration and language from Thomas Jefferson's 1798 resolution opposing the Alien and Sedition Acts -- laws enacted by the federal government during wartime to quiet protest against the government.

The resolution asserts that any instance of the federal government taking action beyond its enumerated powers "shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America."

"It's been taken out of context by some editors," said Pearson, who sponsored the bill. "It certainly never meant secession. The intent was to communicate that the actions of the federal government are an infringement on states' rights."

Robert Natelson, a law professor at the University of Montana who was involved in drawing up that state's sovereignty resolution over a decade ago, argues that states up until now have been unwilling to take action of any real consequence in checking federal power.

"Back then they passed the resolution, but they didn't turn down any federal dollars," he said.

"If the states are serious about returning the federal government to its historical origins, they're going to have to do more than pass resolutions. They're going to have to turn down money and litigate."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/26/tenth-amendment-movement-aims-power-states/

Bill O'Reilly Flips Out (Dance Remix)

RIP Michael Jackson

Wake Up Bozo, The Media Is Controlled!!!

By Z

There seems to be a lot of ignorance about the credibility of the US media in this country. Too many Americans are brainwashed by the daily spread of disinformation. Many Americans don’t suspect anything is wrong because they just haven’t picked up on it or haven’t been exposed to enlightening information on the matter. These are the same idgits who still think we still have a democracy and believe the official 9/11 fable…and probably believe in the Easter bunny and Santa Clause as well. It’s ok though because it’s not their fault. There are a few however who are incapable of accepting the irrefutable facts and evidence that categorically prove that the media is controlled. They go on saying “Why that’s absurd!”, “That’s preposterous”, “That can’t be…our press is free!”, “That only happens in third world countries and can’t happen here

WAKE UP YOU MORON! GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS!

A little side note…in this piece I’m only calling those people morons and other niceties who are incapable of accepting the irrefutable facts and evidence that categorically prove that the media is controlled.

THE EVIDENCE IS RIGHT HERE YOU GOON! YOU DENSE, TURD FOR BRAINS, IMBECILE, IGNORANT, NAÏVE SHEEPLE!

I want to beat those people over the head with my 9 iron, jeez! Ok…I’m cool, I’m cool, just had to get that out of my system.

Now that I have your attention, let’s look at a most excellent quote from a brilliant mind,

“Condemnation without investigation is the highest form of ignorance.”
Albert Einstein

Give that some thought, let it sink in and then read on.



The fact of the matter is that many Americans still insist or persist in believing that we have a free press, while getting most of their news from state-controlled television, under the misconception that reporters are meant to serve the public. Reporters are paid employees and serve the media owners, who usually cower when challenged by advertisers or major government figures. What you have to understand is that a handful of multinational corporations own all the media -TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, book publishers, etc. Theses conglomerates use the media to promote their businesses. Most of the income of for-profit media outlets comes not from their audiences, but from commercial advertisers who are interested in selling products to that audience. For those of you who aren’t familiar with the business world, for-profit corporations are institutions that by law are obligated to put the profits of their investors ahead of all other considerations.

A PUBLICLY TRADED CORPORATION HAS A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO ITS SHAREHOLDERS TO INCREASE AND MAXIMIZE PROFITS.

THE GOAL OF MAXIMIZING PROFITS IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE PRACTICE OF RESPONSIBLE JOURNALISM.

This concentration of ownership reduces the diversity and puts great power in the hands of a few companies. As news outlets fall into the hands of large conglomerates with holdings in many industries, conflicts of interest inevitably interferes with newsgathering. Media corporations share members of the board of directors with a variety of other large corporations including banks, investment companies, oil companies, health care, pharmaceutical, and technology companies.

In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. Now 6 huge corporations - Time Warner, Disney, Vivendi Universal, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -now control most of the media industry in the U.S.

http://www.mediachannel.org/ownership/chart.shtml
http://www.thenation.com/special/bigten.html

What you have to understand is that these journalists have a boss. A boss who tells them what they can say and what they cannot say. They get a story handed down from above which they have to talk about. They then have to pick a position that goes with the format of the network and then they read the teleprompter…just like Obama. They are all actors! They get their news straight out of the biased, subjective mouths of politicians. How is that objective news reporting? You think journalists have free reign to talk about everything they want to talk about? Let me ask you something, how can they? How can a journalist honestly report on anything that would negatively harm the special interests who own the network? They can’t! They wouldn’t have a job. It goes in direct violation of the business and political interests. You can’t have a rogue journalist badmouthing the interests of the network.

Look at this beautiful example…

NBC fired its Pulitzer prize-winning Baghdad correspondent Peter Arnett because he reported the truth. He said the US war plan has failed. He was reporting on NBC, which is owned by General Electric, one of the biggest defense contractors in the United States. If people begin to have doubts about the war, it could hurt GE's business. It is therefore in their best interest to paint the war in as positive terms as possible.

Can we really trust news agencies owned by defense contractors to provide unbiased news in wartime?

I think that question answers itself.

In less than 24 hours Peter was hired by Britain’s Daily Mirror. The tabloid's banner headline said: "Fired by America for telling the truth ... hired by Daily Mirror to carry on telling it." An editor for the Daily Mirror, told CNN, “Peter is one of the most respected journalists in the world, and we are delighted he is joining us to expose the truth about a war increasingly dominated by propaganda…Honesty is not acceptable in the Bush era if it conflicts with the White House view. The Daily Mirror is proud to have hired Peter Arnett. And proud that we have a team dedicated to telling the truth about what is happening in Iraq.”
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/31/sprj.irq.arnett/

Here is a big long list of documented instances of GE’s influence on NBC.
http://homepage.mac.com/herinst/envcrisis/media/ownership/nbc.html#GEonNBC

Since media owners are now so large and deeply involved in the highest levels of the economy, the news and other public information become heavily weighted in favor of all corporate values.

This is the BIGGEST propaganda machine in the history of mankind!



Many journalists, media moguls and people in government are coming out now and blowing the whistle. Jesse Ventura, former Mayor, Governor and Navy Seal, has exposed many lies since he gave up his seat in government. He views on how 9/11 was obviously an inside job is well known. As a patriot he questioned and poked a lot of holes in the official story. He also exposed how there are CIA operatives in every state government, when clearly the CIA is not allowed to be operational in the United States.

He came out with a new book “Don’t Start The Revolution Without Me”, where he exposes the whole democrat/republican smokescreen as a show…an act. In front of the public they make like they’re enemies, but they’re all friends involved in each other’s businesses. He says there is no difference, they’re all politicians who are paid off by the same special interests groups who fund their campaigns. They are owned by the people who gave them the money to put them there. In return, they pass laws which favor and facilitate the agenda of these special interests. The politicians with the most money get in office and stay there 98% of the time. They stay there because of the money the special interests give them. Therefore those who gave them the money, pull the strings. He said it is just like pro wrestling. Looks real, but very much orchestrated and planned. Just like the media. The most powerful media companies routinely make large contributions to both major political parties, while receiving millions of dollars in return in the form of payments for running political ads. He went on record several times and said the media is controlled and how the CIA is present in every major news organization. He said the government owns the media and the media pushes the government’s agenda. Interview here:
http://blog.ktradionetwork.com/2009/06/17/kevins-full-interview-with-jesse-ventura/

After he stepped down as governor, he signed a 3 year contract with MSNBC to do a talk show. Production was under way when MSNBC found out about Jesse’s opposition to the war and they cancelled the show. The same thing happened to Phil Donahue’s show that was #1 on MSNBC. They found out he was against the war and fired him. Remember who owns NBC? That’s right, General Electric. Clearly journalists cannot state their HONEST opinions on TV because they won’t have a job if they do.

Jesse claims he didn’t take part in the briberies and corruption because he was an Independent and the Reps and Dems saw him as an outsider. However, the educated public sees him as an insider…a man who was in there and is now blowing the whistle on the whole shebang!



Former CIA Director William Colby said:

"The central intelligence agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media."

OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD was a secret CIA campaign to influence domestic and foreign media beginning in the 1950s. The media had been recruited and infiltrated by the CIA for propaganda purposes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird
http://www.answers.com/topic/operation-mockingbird
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=vqz&q=cia+operation+mockingbird&aq=0p&oq=CIA+op&aqi=g%3Ap1g9

Thank you Jesse Ventura and many other insiders for confirming that the spooks are still there!

Here are some other reports of the CIA infiltrating the media:

People using CIA and FBI computers have edited entries in the online encyclopedia Wikipedia on topics including the Iraq war and the Guantanamo prison, according to a new tracing program.
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN1642896020070816

An ex-CIA agent details Google's relationship with the Central Intelligence Agency. He claims the CIA helped bankroll Google at its very inception.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/061206seedmoney.htm

Did you guys ever wonder how Google got its hands on an incredibly advanced digital satellite mapping service (Google Earth) which was previously only available to the CIA and other governments called? Hmmm….
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article3652494.ece
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-138824025.html
http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/05/will_the_cia_ce.html;jsessionid=NLJXD2F0YHKNMQSNDLPSKH0CJUNN2JVN

Many Americans think of their supposedly free press as a watchdog on government, mainly because the press itself shamelessly promotes that myth. One of the steps for the control of a population is to control all sources of information the population receives. With the help of the CIA and special interests, the mainstream American Press became a controlled multi-national corporate/government megaphone.



The Bush administration has been caught paying off journalists, here are a few accounts:

Television reporter Mike Vasilinda has pulled in more than $100,000 over the past four years through contracts with the office of Gov. Jeb Bush, the secretary of state, the Department of Education and other Florida government entities that are routinely featured in Vasilinda's widely broadcast stories.
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20050326/NEWS/503260408?Title=TV-reporter-earned-money-from-state

Seeking to build support among black families for its education reform law, the Bush administration paid a prominent black pundit $240,000 to promote the law on his nationally syndicated television show and to urge other black journalists to do the same.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-06-williams-whitehouse_x.htm

Congressional correspondent Jessica Yellin on Anderson Cooper 360 CNN admitted that she was pressured by the network executives to frame her pieces in a way that made President Bush look positive, even editing her pieces to favor the administration.

Yellin: Press corps was under enormous pressure from corporate executives, frankly, to make sure that this was a war that was presented in a way that was consistent with the patriotic fever in the nation and the President's high approval ratings and my own experience at the White House was that the higher the President's approval ratings, the more pressure I had from news executives, and I was not at this network at the time, but the more pressure I had from these executives to put on positive stories about the President. I think over time....

Cooper: You had pressure from news executives to put on positive stories about the President?

Yellin: Not in that exact...they wouldn't say it in that way, but they would edit my pieces. They would push me in different directions. They would turn down stories that were more critical and try to put on pieces that were more positive. Yes. That was my experience.
http://crooksandliars.com/2008/05/29/jessica-yellin-on-cnn-says-news-execs-pressured-her-to-make-bush-look-good/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULw0tfYvxhU

Bill Moyers: April 25, 2007: "Buying the war"

Four years ago this spring the bush administration took leave of reality and plunged our country into a war so poorly planned it soon turned into a disaster. The story of how high officials misled the country has been told. But they couldn't have done it on their own; they needed a compliant press, to pass on their propaganda as news and cheer them on. Since then thousands of people have died, and many are dying to this day. Yet the story of how the media bought what the white house was selling has not been told in depth on television.
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/transcript1.html



Top Journalists Expose Major Cover-ups in Mass Media
http://www.wanttoknow.info/massmedia

Top News Articles Revealing Mass Media Manipulation
http://www.wanttoknow.info/massmedianewsarticles-0-10000

The Power of Nightmares is a revealing BBC documentary that digs deep into the roots of the war on terror, only to find that much of the widespread fear in the post 9/11 world has been fabricated by those in power for their own interests and spread through the media.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2798679275960015727&ei=FlNEStCgD6P2rALP1NG0DQ&q=%22power+of+nightmares%22&hl=en

ABC has now whored itself to the White House so the White House can use them to spread their biased propaganda about the health care plan.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/16/abc-news-teams-obama-white-house-present-presidents-health-care-plan/

Critics are calling this a surrender to the Obama administration’s effort to control the debate. Obama will only answer questions presented by audience members selected by ABC news. Presidents have been, but here it’s flagrantly and blatantly in your face! They get a list of the questions that are going to be asked and who’s going to ask them. This is government controlled media! Isn’t this what they do in North Korea and Communist China?? What they did in Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany?

Kevin Trudeau the infomercial king, author and business man, exposed the corrupt business practices of the pharmaceutical industry, the food industry, the FDA, the FTC and the media in a book he wrote called “Natural Cures “They” Don’t Want You To Know About”. In America only a patented FDA approved drug or surgery can legally prevent, cure or treat a disease. Doctors cannot by law, prevent, treat or cure a disease by natural homeopathic and holistic methods. It is also illegal for a company which sells an herb to claim it has medical benefits. The FDA sued Kevin 37million dollars and told him he couldn’t go on TV, on Radio or any media for at least 3 years, but they’re trying for indefinitely. The FDA was also trying to take his books of the shelves. Even thought it outsold Harry Potter as the number 1 best seller. He also had to publish it himself because no publishing company wanted to stick their neck out. What happened to the First Amendment? Freedom of speech, hello? These Gestapo-like regulatory agencies like the FDA, FTC are trying to suppress public knowledge about these natural cures because them along with the drug companies are making too much damn money. Drug companies are publicly traded companies and they too have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders to increase profits. This is the reason why we haven’t seen any cures for years. If a drug company’s goal would be to cure disease and make people healthy they would go bankrupt! Healthy people don’t buy drugs. Their only purpose is to get people hooked on their drugs and have them buy those drugs until they die. They fund the campaigns of politicians, lie to doctors and pay off the FDA to approve their unsafe drugs.

These drug companies are part of the special interest groups which control the media. Have you bothered to count all the drug commercials on TV nowadays? Drug companies are the #1 advertisers. Have you noticed how none of the journalists on TV ever say anything bad about drug companies? Why wasn’t it headline news when Vioxx killed 200,000 people? Or when AstraZeneca, one of the largest drug manufacturers told their sales reps to lie to their customers/doctors and not tell them that Seroquel causes diabetes? There are literally hundreds of examples of complete media blackouts when it comes to reporting on these stories. There are also hundreds of examples of the media not reporting on possible natural cures. Why? The answer is very simple…you don’t bite the hand that feeds you.



There are many special interest groups that have an influence on the media, but of course the biggest propaganda pushing entity is the government.

These special interest groups or CEO’s from multinational conglomerates (including the media) like to get together with world leaders, politicians and the banking elite every once in a while, to among many things, talk about ways they can work together to increase profits. They hold memberships in various organizations you might have heard of. The Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission and the ever so secretive Bilderberg group.

Now, whenever the CFR meets it’s done publicly. Every year when the G8 meets, and the G20 meets, they do it publicly and everybody knows about it as well. It’s all over the news, magazines, internet, there are even massive riots and protests like in England this year. You hear about everything from who was there and what was discussed, well not everything…but there are press releases. Front page coverage on every major newspaper, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, etc…You see it on every major network NBC, FOX, CNN for weeks!

So...how is it that when more world leaders like princes and royalty, prime ministers, presidents, all the central bankers from the Federal Reserve and around the world, the IMF, the World Bank, NATO, WTO, UN, all the media moguls who control the media, all the owners of the major corporations in the oil industry, pharmaceutical industry, food industry and others from the most powerful nations in the world, get together at a Bilderberg meeting and there’s a complete blackout in the media? Why is there is a much heavier security presence (paramilitary with machine guns) than at the G20? Why is it that when ballzy journalists like Alex Jones and Charlie Skelton from the Guardian,get too close, get followed, threatened and harassed by undercover officials and local police? Here is Charlie’s very detailed account of what happened at this year’s Bilderberg conference in Athens, Greece.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/series/charlie-skeltons-bilderberg-files
What’s with all the secrecy?


Here are a few names of attendees from past Bilderberg meetings:
Prince Philip, Prince Charles, Prince Bernhard, Queen Beatrix , Tim Geitner, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, General Petraeus, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Madeleine Albright, John Edwards, Gerald Ford, Robert Gates, Richard N. Hass, Robert McNamara, Dan Quayle, Colin Powell, Condeleezza Rice, David Rockefeller, David Rockefeller Jr, Nelson Rockefeller, Jay Rockefeller, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, George Soros, Paul Volker, Emma Rothschild, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, Guy de Rothschild, Jacob Rothschild, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, Rupert Murdoch, George Stephanopoulos, Peter Jennings, Fareed Zakaria, Bill Moyers…for a full list see >
http://www.infowars.com/wikipedias-bilderberg-group-attendee-list/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_attendees

Some CFR attendees from the media:

Tom Brokaw (CFR Board of Directors), Dan Rather, Barbara Walters, Fareed Zakaria (CFR Board of Directors) William Buckley, Jim Lehrer, Rupert Murdoch, Michael Eisner. All representing PBS, ABC, NBC, FOX, CBS, Disney, National Review.

Current CFR Board of Directors
http://www.cfr.org/about/people/board_of_directors.html

Current CFR Corporate Roster
http://www.cfr.org/about/corporate/roster.html

CFR controls American media
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPlvdSQ6cAM



So how come not one major media network is reporting on the Bilderberg meetings?? FOX, CNN, NBC, ABC, BLA BLABIDDY BLA BALA…where are you?
Where is the free media?? If you are so free and independent then why aren’t you reporting on the most important meeting that happens every year with the most powerful elite class on the planet?
Where are you Bill O’Reilly? Where are you Sean Hannity? Where are you Mr. Keeping it Real Anderson Cooper?

THIS IS A 100 % MEDIA BLACKOUT AND QUANITFIABLE EVIDENCE THAT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS NOT TELLING YOU THE TRUTH!

Why is it that when some independent journalist asks one of the attendees about it, some deny it even exists? Youtube “We Are Change” and “Bilderberg”. Some might also say “no comment”, “I’m not at liberty to discuss that” or that it’s just a bunch of old farts getting together and it’s not a big deal, nothing to worry about. Like we’re supposed to believe it’s not a big deal when the most important people on earth get together and have a meeting. Right!

The mainstream media is obviously told to step down and not cover the most important event that happens every year. The owners of the mainstream media luckily all attend the Bilderberg and CFR meetings, so it kind of works out perfectly huh?



Both major political parties used the media to build the perception of opposing positions on key issues, while the whole time they are building consensus on issues that were critical to social change. That's verified in the Congressional Record for 1917, which reported that:

“...The j.p. morgan [banking] interests.... And their subsidiary organizations got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the united states and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the us.... They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. ...an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information....”
--Congressman Oscar Callaway statements were included in the Congressional Record (vol. 54, February 9, 1917, p. 2947)
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9D04EEDE1F3FEE3ABC4951DFB366838A639EDE

Here we have J.P. Morgan on record! Bankers have bought and paid the media in this country time and time again people.
Here we have the head of the most prominent banking family admitting media collusion:

“We are grateful to the washington post, the new york times, time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been quite impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, now that the world is more sophisticated, it is prepared to march towards a world government and accept the supranational sovereignty of an intellectual and financial elite, which is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries…”

David Rockefeller

Rockefeller writes on page 405 of his memoirs:

“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the united states, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, i stand guilty, and i am proud of it.”

Straight from the horse’s mouth!



The United States' original communications policy is the 1st Amendment. Freedom of the press was guaranteed in the Constitution because an exchange of information and an unfettered debate were considered essential components of a democratic society. Today, however, government policy is designed less to facilitate a democratic discussion than to protect the investments of media corporations. Regulations tend to promote the formation of huge media conglomerates and discourage new, competing voices. Although even the information you get on the internet nowadays should be taken with a grain of salt, there are many excellent alternative news outlets available, which are a much better source for truthful information than the mainstream media. There is entirely too much crap that the mainstream media focuses on. Britney Spears and her drug use, Lindsey Lohan is dating a lesbian, Kim Kardashian has a fat ass and likes it…are you kidding me? Seriously? This is not even news first of all, it’s gossip! This is intentionally done to dumb down the public.

“All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach.”
Adolf Hitler

Adolf was a sick puppy, but he sure was smart.
The media is just a propaganda machine used to influence your thinking and feelings, in order to gain your trust or distrust, acceptance or unacceptance of world events so the elite can continue with their agenda. So do yourself a favor and turn your TV off, it’s not doing anything but brainwashing you. You owe it to yourself to have a non-bias conduit that does not twist and bend the news to satisfy various external interests. If after all this you still think we have a free media, then clearly you are living on Fantasy Island. The plane, the plane…WAKE UP YOU MORON!

You know why I can say that?

Because I don’t have a boss and I can say whatever I want! I’m practicing my 1st Amendment rights baby!

I leave you with a little philosophical clarity…

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”
Arthur Schopenhauer

Kissinger says Obama will change Regime in Iran if the coup fails

Here is Kissinger basically saying that Obama must make clear what kind of government he wants in Iran. The president of the United States has to decide what kind of government he wants in Iran?? Since when is Iran part of the United States? If the coup is unsuccessful and a "popularly based" government does not emerge, then WE the United States must work for regime change in Iran from the outside. This is an indicted war criminal making threats against a sovereign nation.